Customer Data Platform - Some Key Requirements

There's a growing trend in the digital industry to create or use Customer Data Platforms (CDPs). I will be hopefully covering this technical solution in future posts. However in the meantime iIf you are looking to implement one, here are some key (technical) requirements to consider:

• It provides a central unified customer data repository
• It allow simple / easy integration from a range of different data sources
• It supports a decoupled digital architecture, ideally via web services architecture
• It is able to elastically scale as demand and integration needs grow
• It is is resilient e.g. it provides fail-over (cold or warm) to separate disaster recover locations

The 7 myths of Search Engine Optimisation - Part 2

Part 2? Have you read Part 1 first?

Here's the second part of my post on the myths of SEO:

SEO can be done once and then stopped (even if you’re top ranked)
I can imagine many people reading this are saying to themselves.. “Hayden, you’re an SEO consultant. Of course, you’re going to tell us that you’re still needed once you’ve done your job”. However (with some poetic license and a very high-level perspective) there are only 4 factors that affect a website’s organic positions:

1. What goes into creating it
2. What other sites link to it
3. What changes the search engines make
4. What your competition (or their SEO agency) does 

Each of these could change on a daily basis. You only have some control over the first item (the content, code and other technical things), a little control over who links to you and then no control over the third and fourth factors.

Or more succinctly put… whatever search engine ranking position you have today (and yes, even if you have managed to get to the top) may not be the one you have tomorrow. And with no effort devoted to maintaining what you have achieved, it is increasingly likely that you will drop in the rankings just as quickly as you rose.


Ranking is the same for all users in all locations
There used to be a time (a long while ago) where you only got one set of global results from a search engine. Then things improved and now, even for the same brand of search engine (Google, Bing, etc.) you get different results if you are:
- In a different country
- In a different town
- Logged in to your Google account
- On a different device – see below
Note: This does make life difficult for SEO people who have to tell clients “I know you think you’re not on the first page, but you are on my device” or vice-versa.


Desktop and Mobile versions of Search Engines rank sites the same
No. They. Don’t!
And now… if you think you’re able to get away with creating a responsive website that shows just the same heavy images in desktop view and in mobile view, but just scaled down using the browser… as of this month, you’re probably going to get a surprise.


SEO is a ‘black art’ practiced by techies
Sure, there is a certain amount of technical optimisation that must now go in to any organic improvement piece of work. But there’s loads you can do as part of your marketing or PR day job for SEO.
1. Write articles you want to read & share, on topics relevant to terms you want to place for in the search engines
2. Structure your content to make it scan-able, readable and understandable.
3. Ask for links back to your website from partners, suppliers, journalists, etc.
4. And finally, stop believing in SEO myths

The 7 myths of Search Engine Optimisation - Part 1

Recently I had to give a presentation on Digital Marketing to a client. One of the key slides we focused was on the topic of “SEO Myths”.

I have therefore decided to write these myths up a post for others to add to and discuss.

Reaching 1st position in Google is the only aim of SEO
This is wrong advice in a couple of key areas:

1. What terms are you actually focusing on? If you’re either striving for a top place ranking on an obscure term or alternatively trying to be top for everything… think again. You should be looking at those terms that meet your KPI’s (e.g. deliver conversions) and have enough search volume to justify the effort of attempting to reach first place
2. Sometimes 2nd (or 3rd, etc.) place is good enough. If you’re targeting a popular search term and have reached the first page in Google, but there are bigger, more reputable and faster sites above you, you might be content with that (especially if it gets you decent & quality traffic)

A single teenager in a bedroom can out-smart Google
You still hear this sort of phrase spoken by people in the marketing industry “I know a genius, they have worked out how to ‘beat’ Google and get my sites to number one”. And each time… I feel myself suppressing a small scream. Why?

1. Just one person (who does not work at Google) who has only amassed knowledge from reading books, blogs and other such material on the subject of SEO knows everything on the subject.
2. Google hires offices full of very (very) clever people… many of whom have PHD’s and such qualifications, to constantly revise their search algorithms and the influence of different ranking factors. And even most of them don’t know everything on the subject.
3. You never ‘beat’ Google. It’s not a fight or a race… SEO is both an art and a science to getting your website legitimately up the rankings of the most popular western search engine.
   (and even if you temporarily manage to boost your rankings via less-than-legitimate means... there's a chance you'll get found out)

You can ignore SEO by just creating good content
OK, yes the creation of well written content helps SEO. But that content must also be:

• Relevant: Or else you’re just producing off-topic copy that serves no optimisation purpose 
• Structured: If you’re not adding layout, headings, bullet points, etc. then you’re not producing content, you’re just typing. 
• Linked: Are you creating lots of ‘orphaned’ pages to drop visitors into from other campaigns such as email PPC, etc.? Please don’t!

What's in a name?

"So why did you name your company Ideal Interface?" is a question I have heard quite a lot in the 11 years since it was founded.

This article may explain:
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/why-ideal-interface-hayden-sutherland/

Digital Architecture fundamentals

As part of a recent project, I was asked to come up with some architecture fundamentals of a digital system (not just a one application system, but a more complex and integrated solution assumed to be for a larger organisation).

Here’s my list:

• The architecture of a system or integrated systems needs to align to (or fit into) the overall ‘As-Is’ and ‘To-Be’ enterprise architecture of your organisation.
  
• Those creating the architecture need to first understand the business goals (e.g. the customer experience and commercial aims) and the major applications that ‘the business’ are likely to need in the medium term or have signed longer-term contracts with.
  
• A loosely coupled architecture provides the flexibility to use best-of-breed solutions from a range of vendors. The opposite is that either through design or legacy system adoption, your architecture shackled to one key supplier who is then possibly also integrated directly to multiple other systems… this obviously creates a dependency upon this key supplier, making them harder to subsequent remove and replace. Adopting a loosely coupled architecture also means you are not tied to specific front-end software, allowing your organisation the flexibility to either buy or build (typically using agile product & developers) to create the best user experience possible.
  
• Where possible, create a single in-house database, that can be updated by any other integrated systems… ideally in real-time. You don’t have to store all data that exists in every other integrated systems in this central repository, just those that you may need to align other data to at some point in the future.
  Note: It is possible that this service could also be provided as another integrated system, but for overall speed, agility and ultimately data ownership you may find it best that this database sits within the boundary of your main architecture. However, this does come with additional considerations: there is an overhead in managing and administrating a significantly large database, plus the data model used needs to be sufficiently flexible and scale-able to handle a variety of requirements over time.

Can your site cope with sale volumes?

Right now the Marks & Spencer website is saying it is unavailable.

The M&S sale has started today. But it is not even possible to look (let alone buy) their products online.

Digital Agility Needs A Digital Core

The ability of any organisation to remain flexible and adaptable to changes in market conditions, improvements in technology and evolving customer needs is now becoming essential. Outdated business models, approaches and products & services no longer keep a company competitive and ultimately successful.

Having the ability to swiftly deliver and manage rich online experiences and digital functionality across multiple channels and touch-points is almost mandatory now.  But this requires a core digital core architecture that allows Information Technology providers (either in-house or as vendors) to respond quicker and quicker.

Note: It also requires a change in the organisation's mindset